Network】 【znnw shoe Recently, PUMA was founded in 1948, the company produced a "light as light running shoes", weighs only 173 grams, for all sports they both love the look of people pay attention to fashion a new experience. Puma (PUMA) is the world's leading dynamic living brand, the company designs and develops all kinds of footwear, apparel and accessories, sold more than 120 countries and regions in Germany Heer Zuo Root – He if Lage, Boston , London, England, and with headquarters in Hong Kong, China. Set of newly developed PUMAL.IFTRacer running shoes lightweight, colorful, and highly breathable three main features in one, the financial function and fashion sense as a whole, both positive and meet the needs of people who love sports, but also with the appearance of those who pay attention to taste for the area in 2009 added a touch of fashion PUMA unique dynamic style. LIFT Racer running shoes with super light foam body mold in an injection molding shoe production process, eliminating the need for stitching shoes and bonding process itself, saving materials, but also greatly reduce the weight of the shoe, the entire pair of shoes only 173 grams weight, is by far the world's one of the most lightweight running shoes. The materials, LIFTRacer use of fine suede and polished elliptical rotary screen fabric and provide maximum air permeability of the ventilation holes blend of leather, the upper-piece, seamless, very perfect permeability, is a no place, any occasion can be multi-purpose wear shoes.

】 【I want to comment

【】 【Print】

znnw Footwear News Network on September 23, footwear brands such as Belle, Puma, Adidas, Nike accounts for a sizeable market share, but the "big tree attracts the wind", the brand shoes are the greatest risk of counterfeiting, were business counterfeiting of their products to become well-known footwear brands have to face and endure a fact. Recently, the footwear brand footwear brands for infringement of a centralized response. Puma: the brand hard defenders In foreign footwear brands, the Puma movement Rights largest even to carry out the long relentless defenders away. In recent years, several shopping centers in Guangdong due to sales of goods with "Puma" in trademark leopard graphics to court. According to the Guangzhou Municipal Intermediate People's Court statistics Intellectual Property: From June 2006 to August 2009 13 date, Guangzhou City Intermediate People's Court and the grass-roots courts have handled "Puma" Trademark Rights cases 1082. According to "Puma" provide information to the court, "Puma" as early as 1978, China registered a "PUMA" trademark, "Leopard-shaped pattern" trademark and "PUMA and the Leopard Graphics" trademark, and a large number in China use. As "Puma" and the success of the brand loved by consumers, a number of "edition contains" and "Puma" product rushed out. "Puma" in many "cottage version of" product market share, brand reputation affect their case, the last 3 years, one after another to the allegedly infringing web site, manufacturers, major shopping malls, professional wholesale market stalls and other self-employed court. According to the Guangzhou Municipal Intermediate Court Intellectual Property Tribunal of Li Chi-Sen recalls, "Puma" Trademark Rights in Guangzhou the first shot fired in June 2006, and the gun directly at Taobao. Taobao was for the 43 932 PUMA Online Shop provide sales platform products. These scattered all over the online shop selling a large number of "Puma" fake counterfeit products, so the "Puma" will Taobao court, claims RMB 100 million, and demanded an apology Taobao advertised. However, the "Puma" in litigation and other activists came first but the result is lost. Responsible for hearing the case of the Guangzhou Municipal Intermediate Court Taobao completed a site review of duties dismissed as the "Puma," the company claims. First lost and did not let the "Puma" companies to stop the pace of Rights, it has to be sold in Guangzhou cottage "Puma" manufacturers, large department stores, stalls and small self-employed professional wholesale market stalls to court to claim , depending on the violations and sales, claim the amount from a few thousand dollars to several hundred thousand range. "3 years down, 'Puma' Report of the 1082 total businesses. Win rate of seventy to eighty per cent, as the White Horse, Shahe such a large garment wholesale market, have largely been 'against' once was." Intellectual Property Institute in Guangzhou, a court judge handling the case told reporters. "'Puma' large quantities of Rights cases, describe some of the enhanced awareness of international brands Rights." Lai Chi-Sen said. According to what he learned, the "Puma" and activism have also made some success.

Germany Rudolf Dassler Sport Puma Inc (Puma) v. Yongzhou, 12 shopping centers in Shaoyang two trademark infringement disputes on the 12th Wing City Intermediate People's Court in the trial. Since the plaintiffs are Germany's "Puma", the court heard 12 cases combined. Puma plaintiff company began in China since 1978, registered the "PUMA" trademark, the "Leopard Graphics" trademark, "PUMA and the Leopard Graphics" trademark. First half of 2008, after market research, Poma company that Yongzhou, two 12 Shaoyang Market sales of some products using the trademarks, the manufacturers of these products or sales persons are not authorized production or sales. Poma Company believes that the behavior of 12 shopping centers of its trademark infringement was indicted, the defendant requested an order to stop infringement and requested an order for each defendant for damages 50,000 yuan. a defendant's 12 businesses as Yongzhou, two department stores in Shaoyang, supermarket chains, including Red Sun, backgammon, and so the new company Dah Sing. 12 court cases, the Puma company and the defendant eventually agreed to mediation. November 24, Puma company with 12 shopping centers under the auspices of the mediation in the courts. It is understood that Puma has in recent years in Beijing, Wenzhou, carried out a series of defenders in succession proceedings.

】 【I want to comment

【】 【Print】

Haikou, South China network on January 15 (Reporter Li Hao interns He Lingdi photo coverage) with the New Year approaching, newspaper and business, quality supervision departments of stocking up joint anti-counterfeiting actions in full swing. Problem dry goods, nor candy, and so on counterfeit wines, stocking a large number of issues have been "arrested," many readers every day to provide different clues, with the newspaper operations. 15-day anti-counterfeiting operations, joint newspaper uncovered hundreds of fake business sector brands. Operation, Trade and Industry Bureau reporter joint Haikou Longhua Temple of Commerce and Industry Branch of the West by law enforcement personnel, clothing wholesale market in the victory of sand, Plaza Road, part of the seized counterfeit clothing, "Puma", "Adidas" hundreds of clothing and socks pieces. Sand Road in the victorious clothing wholesale market, the business of law enforcement officers for examination found that stall holders selling internationally famous brand "Puma" sports wear, but the owner has provided no formal credentials and valid proof of purchase. Recognition of these costumes are the ultimate owners from counterfeit products into the wholesale market in Guangzhou, business personnel, who it seized and further investigation and action. Subsequently, the business of law enforcement officers to provide clues to insiders, to Plaza Road, check some of clothes shops and a clothing store and found a group of "Adidas" sport socks. Verified by law enforcement officers revealed that more than 70 pairs of sports socks also Department of counterfeit products. Owners say this is from Guangzhou into the cargo. Then, in the Plaza Road, another sportswear shop, law enforcement officers also dealt with a number of fake "Adidas" sport shirt. In the investigation scene, officers accountable to the business owners, these so-called designer clothes are a number of small garment factory in Guangzhou processing workshop product, purchase price, but more than 20 yuan, while pretending to brand, the price can be sold for 200 yuan. Owners also said the fake brand-name hanging in the store, to attract more customers to come, if the other party to bargain, it will further reduce prices.

】 【I want to comment

【】 【Print】

znnw Footwear News Network November 10, printed with "Puma" logo of the shoes in the hands of judges and pass inspection. Morning, in a court in the hospital, said the German trademark infringement in the tread of a shoe company to company claims more than 50 million. As the present case the plaintiff, a German company of PUMA (translated as "Puma") series of brands, has over 50 years of history, one of the world's top ten sports brand. This reporter learned that the company sue Tap Shoes Co., Ltd. Beijing in the case of a total of five, the judge decided today joinder. The plaintiff alleged that, in riding shoes footwear sold in some positive and side sections have copied the "Puma" logo. In Xicheng, Haidian, Changping and other places within 5 chain was found in all the infringing goods. Tap shoes required in the company to stop infringement and damages totaling more than 50 million. The court, the plaintiff would have been notarized and sealed good shoes onto the court involved, let the judges view. Tap shoes in the legal adviser said there was no trademark infringement, do not agree to compensation. The consultant said that in step a number of brand shoes footwear consignment of goods, these shoe companies have issued the legal procedures, so consignment was legal. As of press time, the trial continues.

znnw Footwear News Network July 24 July 23, Beijing Municipal Industry and Commerce announced the 11 models failed the list of goods and footwear, in which a man Puma casual shoes under the "blacklist." Yesterday's visit found that, Changchun still have problems selling shoes. Agents said the deal will make shelves. "We do not have this batch of shoes." Yesterday's department store business in the country do not see the problem batches of shoes, sales staff told reporters that the date of issue of shoe production in November 2007, the time earlier, the market is left unlikely. Reporter has visited Asia and Thailand Fu Yuan, Zhuo Zhanbiao horse counter, also found no problem in selling shoes. But in the long 100-store shoe press revealed that the batch problem. Staff said that this shoe did not know there are quality problems, have not received a notice under the planes. Afterward, the reporter linked to the Puma Lujing Li Changchun, a dealer, she told reporters that their products are five stores in Changchun on sale, including the Commerce, Long 100, the five stores in Asia and Thailand. Problem only in the long 100 shoes on sale, quantity is not much, only dozens of double. "I also just received notification Beijing headquarters, asked to address the issue shoes all the shelves." Lujing Li said she had been told long 100 shoes store shelves the problem. As for whether consumers can return, has not yet received treatment based on this advice. Consumers Association of Changchun City, Zhong Ping, Deputy Secretary-General said that under the "Consumer Protection Law" stipulates that merchants selling substandard products, consumers the right to request Return. If consumers buy the shoes is the same Beijing Industry and Commerce announced the production date, batch number of the issues the same shoes, you can ask the business return.

】 【I want to comment

【】 【Print】

znnw Footwear News Network December 23, EU 22, the decision in the midst of controversy on the Chinese and Vietnamese leather shoes to impose 15 months of anti-dumping duties. The EU said in a statement, the EU environment ministers in the case of dispute the decision not to extend anti-dumping duties. EU 3 years to China and Vietnamese leather shoes respectively 16.5% and 10% levy anti-dumping duties, a move strongly opposed by the Chinese. Di Race (Diesel), Adidas (Adidas) and Puma (Puma) and other large shoe factories in Asia to extend the enterprise anti-dumping duties against. European Commission (European Commission) released data showing China's and Vietnam's footwear accounted for 30% of EU market share.

Yesterday (14), Germany Rudolf Dassler Sport Poma AG (the PUMA company) sued the Agriculture, supermarkets (Holdings) Limited (NGS Supermarket) for trademark infringement case in Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court. The original defendant in the trial after both sides decided to accept the mediation. The months of evidence lawyers PUMA, the company said Anshan in the NGS supermarket shop to buy two pairs of shoes, the surface of decorative patterns and Puma PUMA trademark logo similar to, so to make a public apology, financial compensation 500 thousand yuan and other claims. PUMA licensed to counsel, to promptly stop all kinds of counterfeit PUMA trademark infringement, they specialized in some key areas to send lawyers stationed investigation "knockoff." In 2007, PUMA companies law firm lawyers Agriculture, Anshan supermarket shop found a sports shoe sales counter in the display of shoes, decorative patterns and PUMA Puma registered trademark logo is very similar, so that the units of Agriculture, supermarket sales violation of PUMA's trademark. September 2007, they and the notary office staff to Agriculture, supermarket store to purchase the shoes of the allegedly infringing evidence, then sent to the NGS supermarket to stop infringement of the lawyer's letter. After 2 communicated, NGS supermarket stores continued to sell this controversial product, so PUMA NGS supermarket company sued. The defendant denied the infringement Agriculture, the agent of the supermarket supermarket yesterday pleaded not exist violations, said the sale of goods suspected of infringing trademark PUMA is a single counter investment, does not belong to NGS supermarket business. And that the evidence in court showing the two goods do not reflect the trademark logo and PUMA approximation. Although both sides in court against each other, but the court or agreed to accept the court after the mediation. PUMA company attorney that such a result is expected. Who has represented companies and large Conditioner PUMA supermarket, Tesco supermarket, supermarkets and other large supermarkets Wumart similar litigation, the majority of cases to mediation ended, the related compensation is relatively high. They also hope the court ruling on infringement unit of the public apology in the media, on the other tortfeasor serve as a warning. Reporter learned from the Shanghai Second Intermediate People's Court, PUMA companies throughout recent trademark infringement dispute has indicted more than 50, the defenders very positive. PUMA Company attorneys have said that at present the market is very easy to find PUMA's "siege" products. Evidence to the public when they issued questionnaires showed that the majority of consumers interviewed believe that these "cottage" near authentic products and PUMA, and even counterfeit products consumers will mistakenly believe that genuine complaints to them. A large number of infringing products to the PUMA brand reputation has been significantly affected, PUMA brand ranking falling from 2005, which is rampant counterfeit products have a direct relationship.

【Network】 PUMA PUMA footwear znnw season's new shoes, the color can be said to be colorful, but style is commendable, the movement is also somewhat a little sexy.

PUMA PUMA shoes color colorful season

Click here to view all news pictures see more industry news>>>

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Next

】 【I want to comment

【】 【Print】

Many people love sports brand that "PUMA" This sporting goods brands, and this year, with "PUMA" brand of German Rudolf Dassler Sport Puma AG (hereinafter referred to as Puma) Quedui Suzhou a very angry that supermarkets and their lawsuit to court. Yesterday, reporters from the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court of understanding of intellectual property rights, the Puma company sued by the Trust-Mart Department Stores and Commercial Co., Ltd. Suzhou trademark disputes have been the verdict. Puma company allegedly infringing ignore prosecution anger In 2007, Puma's workers discovered in Suzhou Trust Mart supermarket shelves is selling marked with graphics similar to a registered trademark Puma sports shoes, priced at more than 80 yuan a pair. Trust-Mart sent to stop the infringement immediately followed quickly, the supermarket is no response, still selling the allegedly infringing shoes. Puma alleged that the company is an internationally renowned sports brand advocates, brand popular in 80 countries and regions worldwide with high popularity and good reputation in the market. 70 years from the last century, the Puma company in China has registered the "PUMA", "Leopard Graphics" and "PUMA and the Leopard Graphics" and mark, by a large number of long-term use of these trademarks and Puma products has established excellent market reputation and business reputation. The Trust-Mart's subjective malicious behavior significantly, objectively ordinary consumers would mistake, violation of Puma is a registered trademark, damage the company's good reputation. Puma claims to the court: decree Trust-Mart to immediately stop infringing; compensation Puma 500 thousand yuan of economic losses; in the media openly eliminating the effects of apology; bear the cost of litigation case. Supermarkets have argued that not mislead the consumer products fulfill their obligations Puma attorney for the company's request of an agent in the courtroom on the Trust-Mart presented its case, they think: First, the Trust-Mart is selling business, has been under the legal requirements and the obligation to make a reasonable review provides the legal origin of the product, so should not be liable for damages. Secondly, the involved products are marked with two product brands and manufacturers, prices are just over 80 yuan a pair, and Puma is far from the company's product prices are not misleading the public. In addition, the Trust-Mart has provided statistical data supplier annual sales, according to this data, the amount of Puma company claims no basis in fact. Trust-Mart's agent requested the court dismissed all other claims. Tort, or a judge sort out the innocent distinguish right and wrong focus Puma 500 thousand yuan of compensation claims have a legal basis? This is the focus of controversy in this case. The burden of proof by the parties and cross-examination and the court's certification, the Court Full Court found that: Trust-Mart sells, "Backgammon", "Step Lion" mark on the shoes and the Puma trademark of similar companies involved in graphics like patterns, consumption those with ordinary attention often can not accurately distinguish between the objective of the above can easily lead to consumers mistakenly believe that the two brands of shoes is Puma product, or that there is some kind of association with Puma, which led to the error Xiaofei.